XLMStellarCrypto (majors)as of 2026-08-12
Horizon

Issued 2026-08-12 at $0.16 · now $0.16 (2026-08-13, −1.7% since)

Based on its own history, a month from the 2026-08-12 close, XLMUSD has typically landed between $0.12 and $0.22 — a range of −26.4% to +34.7% from the issuance price $0.16.

Range of outcomes in historically similar periods — not a price prediction. Ranges are scored publicly on /methodology.
  • Actual close
  • Typical path (median)
  • Middle 50% of outcomes
  • 90% range

3,269 overlapping 1 month windows · 2017-08-012026-07-13 · basis climatology · forecast (batch).

The cone is anchored at the 2026-08-12 issuance close ($0.16) — the price the forecast resolves against on 2026-09-11, not the latest close. The drawn path shape is illustrative (bands widen with √t); every labeled number is real — the anchor, the scored batch p90/IQR endpoints, and the typical move.

What is Stellar? iThe crypto-majors record — distribution ranges only; crypto's monthly direction has not proven calibratable, so no directional probability is published.

Stellar is a blockchain designed for issuing and transferring digital assets and for cross-border payments. Its native asset, XLM (lumens), pays network fees. Transactions are confirmed by a consensus of trusted nodes rather than by mining; it launched in 2014.

Reference facts about the network, as of 2026-08-11 — not a view on the asset.

52-week range$0.1592 · 5% of range
$0.1434 low$0.4306 high

Trailing 52 weeks to 2026-08-13 — factual context, not a signal.

Where XLM has typically landed a month from the 2026-08-12 close of $0.162 — the range is history, not a prediction.

$0.1193worst · -26.4%$0.2181best · +34.7%
  • now $0.1592 (-1.7%)
  • typicalThe typical outcome — half of similar past periods did better and half did worse (not an average, so a few wild periods don't skew it). $0.1541 (-4.9%)
  • middle 50%The central range of outcomes — half of similar past periods landed inside it, a quarter finished above, a quarter below. $0.1372$0.1709
  • 90% rangeA nine-in-ten range — in about nine of every ten similar past periods the outcome stayed within these bounds. $0.1193$0.2181

Ranges only — no directional probability for crypto.iCrypto's monthly direction has not proven calibratable in our validation harness (2026-07-25). See /methodology.

Actual 1-month windows behind the coneiEvery overlapping 1-month window in this security's own price history was ranked by realized return; shown are the 3 worst and 3 best of 3,270 windows spanning 2017-08-01 to 2026-08-13. Not cherry-picked — these are the extremes of the full sample. Max drop / max rise are the deepest and highest points reached within each window. See /methodology.
StartReturnMax dropMax rise
3 worst
2018-11-15−59.8%−59.8%+5.1%
2018-11-16−59.5%−60.1%+4.3%
2018-11-13−58.9%−58.9%+0.0%
3 best
2017-12-04+815.3%+0.0%+815.3%
2017-11-18+653.2%+0.0%+653.2%
2017-11-17+640.0%+0.0%+640.0%

3,270 overlapping windows · 2017-08-012026-08-13 · not cherry-picked

Logged immutably 2026-08-13 06:06:38 UTC; scored 2026-09-11.

Seasonality · by month iHow this security has tended to do in each calendar month historically — a frequency, never a prediction.

iFor each calendar month, the share of years this security closed higher than the month before, and the average month-over-month return, over ~9 years of its own price history. Cells are shaded by average return. This is historical frequency, not a prediction — no month is a signal.
Jan
56%
+22.4%
n=9
Feb
33%
−5.0%
n=9
Mar
56%
+1.9%
n=9
Apr
44%
+13.8%
n=9
May
33%
+3.5%
n=9
Jun
11%
−16.5%
n=9
Jul
78%
+20.1%
n=9
Aug
11%
−10.0%
n=9
Sep
44%
−4.9%
n=9
Oct
56%
+13.8%
n=9
Nov
33%
+76.0%
n=9
Dec
22%
+24.1%
n=9

Up-frequency and average month-over-month return · historical frequency, not a prediction

Earnings & context analysis

These panels are being prepared. They are generated by multiple language models, checked, and stored before display — never written live for a page view. Until a model panel has been generated and reviewed for a company, nothing is shown here, honestly, rather than a placeholder.

Research tool, not investment advice — historical frequencies, not recommendations. Full terms.